Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Tarantin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 00:53, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

James Tarantin[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

TOW talk 07:52, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Sir Rcsprinter, Bt (gab) @ 09:35, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Sir Rcsprinter, Bt (chinwag) @ 09:35, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Question User:Tow: as nominator, what is your rationale for deletion? Ansh666 19:07, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure at all here but I think the subject does not meet the notability guidelines for people. -- TOW talk 20:58, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, that's what I expected. Even if you're not sure, it's better to put something so that someone doesn't speedy keep it since there's no rationale for deletion. I don't usually comment on WP:BLP AfDs, so my work is done here. Thanks, Ansh666 21:08, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:58, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:AUTHOR. His one self-published book doesn't meet any of the criteria of WP:BKCRIT. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 21:39, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti^{*Let's talk!*} 06:50, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:AUTHOR and others. Basically a promotional page on a Youtuber with a self-published book. Harry the Dog WOOF 07:05, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for the same reason that I have also recommended deletion of the article about his book: a complete lack of significant coverage in reliable, independent sources. Not notable, despite the Larry King name-dropping. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 15:59, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.